|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
 |





























|
|
|
|
|
Best Practice Examples From High Performance Companies
There are
seven categories in The Best of the Best. Each
section includes specific examples from Baldrige winners.
-
Leadership
Approaches
-
Strategic
Planning Approaches
-
Customer
and Market Focus
-
Information
and Analysis Approaches
-
Human
Resource Approaches
-
Process
Management Approaches
-
Business
Results.
Leadership
Approaches is available for no fee here. The complete
set, a 50 page document, is
available for $75.00 from PDG.
Leadership
Approaches
The Best of the Best build a leadership
system around a core set of clear, easily remembered
values and a team or network of leaders. This system
creates a clear focus on the need to understand and
serve customers. It also sets a clear direction for
the whole organization and creates a motivational
climate to carry out the direction. The leadership
system also includes behaviors that motivate and empower
people to fulfill high expectations. The leadership
system involves all leaders throughout the firm in
a search for future business opportunities which will
increase and share the wealth created with all stakeholders.
Leaders working within the leadership
system are highly visible. They spread leadership
behavior to all parts of the firm by acting as role
models. As a system, leadership is not dependent on
a sole individual, although a sole leader (such as
Fred Smith at FedEx, or Horst Schulze at Ritz-Carlton
Hotels) may supply much of the stimulus and inspiration
for building a leadership system. Even low-level employees
can be leaders by behaving in ways that stimulate
improvements and innovations in pursuit of the firm’s
overall mission.
The leadership system creates "aim-high"
expectations through leaders’ personal involvement
in goal setting, coaching management, and in reviewing
and promoting improvement and progress toward future
directions. Aggressive. "leapfrog" goals
are characteristic of the Best of the Best. They set
these goals based on solid benchmarks from leaders
in other industries that demonstrate that such goals
are achievable.
Leaders also communicate their expectations
by inspecting and reviewing key operations and results.
The Best of the Best involve leaders at all levels
in weekly, monthly, quarterly and annual reviews of
company performance and of progress in implementing
plans and improvements. These reviews increase the
visibility of leaders throughout the organization
and provide major opportunities for personal role
modeling of important values. They also provide opportunities
for the leaders to coach and facilitate teams working
within the organization to implement plans. These
reviews directly link planning with leadership. Among
the most important reviews in communicating leadership
are reviews of Baldrige assessment results which drive
the adoption of a high performance business approaches
throughout the firm.
Leaders working in the system show
the importance of the core values by "walking
the talk" – personally spending time with key
stakeholders such as customers, employees, teams,
suppliers and community representatives to listen,
inform themselves on the needs of these stakeholders,
and to show the values of the firm by personal example.
They act as coaches, teachers, and facilitators rather
than bosses. Leaders in most high performing firms
spend significant amounts of time understanding customers
and even the customer’s customers.
The leadership system also includes
promotion of ethical and responsible behavior and
good business and corporate citizenship. This often
includes striving to go beyond mere conformance in
areas such as environmental stewardship, waste reduction,
and public health, safety and security. Often corporations
adopt a broad goal such as educational reform, improving
the health care system, or helping the needy, as a
systematic approach to sharing with the surrounding
community. They build their corporate citizenship
activities into their continuous improvement efforts.
Frequently, less senior managers taking the lead inside
the company in citizenship initiatives are building
a network and the skills which will enable them to
become future leaders within the firm. Corporate citizenship
benefits the firm by building up the firm’s reputation
with prospective employees, customers and other stakeholders.
The leadership system is continuously
improved by soliciting factual input on the quality
and effectiveness of leadership from surveys and contacts
with the workforce, customers, and suppliers. Leadership
improvement surveys ask respondents to rate those
above them on key behaviors needed to achieve high
performance. The leaders use this input and other
facts to systematically revise and improve the leadership
system.
The following specific examples show
how some of the Best of the Best companies put these
general approaches to work within their own management
systems.
- Most leaders borrow
or invent their vision for their firms. In the 1980s,
Xerox CEO, David Kearns, studied the four year transformation
of Fuji Xerox into a Deming Award winning
firm. By 1982 Kearns and his whole executive committee
had defined and adopted a total quality transformation
process for Xerox Corp which was performing
very poorly at the time. (Their worst year was 1984
when return on assets sank close to zero.) Xerox
leadership entitled their remake of Xerox, "Leadership
Through Quality." This transformation was based
on benchmarks of the best firms in the world and
was launched in 1983. By 1988 Xerox leaders adopted
Baldrige assessments to drive the development and
deployment of world-class management. When they
won the Baldrige Award in 1989 their total corporate
return on assets had been improving by one point
per year for five years, and the rate of improvement
was accelerating. By the time Xerox won the award
(five years after their competitive crisis) they
were gaining market share back in all markets where
the Japanese competition had eroded their earlier
dominance.
- Merrill Lynch
Credit Corporation
defines its leaders as "Champions for change"
and "Champions for all that must not change"
referring to their principles and values. Their
leadership system identifies 7 activities of leaders:
Commitment and Focus, Organization and Planning,
Education and Training, Measurement and Ranking,
Communication and Sharing, Problem Management and
Prevention, and Recognition and Rewards.
- The CEO of the Ritz-Carlton
Hotel chain personally trains every employee
of each new hotel. He tells them why they are important
to the company. They have a mission to be "Ladies
and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen."
They serve by providing customers with a genuinely
pleasing interface which ensures that Ritz guests
enjoy genuine care and comfort during their stay.
Top leaders of the company personally examine customer
feedback and monitor the training systems that guarantee
that guest will be delivered carefully selected,
fully trained, and highly motivated service.
- AT&T Universal
Card Services
(a credit card company that AT&T started up)
set up a completely new organization with executives
drawn from over 17 high performing organizations
including American Express, Citicorp, MasterCard
International, and VISA among others.
This talented group had to form a leadership team
with a common set of values and culture. They began
by identifying their AT&T customer focused mission
and values. Then, to ensure that they welded the
best of all of their previous cultures together,
they appointed an observer in every executive meeting
to note how well the discussions and decisions in
the meeting upheld the values of the new firm. The
observer provided feedback at the end of each session.
Within 9 months executive behavior had become consistent
with values as measured by responses to employee
surveys.
- Texas Instruments
Defense Systems Electronics Group (TI) identified
five leadership imperatives for all their senior
managers:
- Own the vision
- Teamwork
- Communicate, Communicate!
- Learning (Don’t
shoot the messenger)
- Participatory (collaborative)
style
By stressing these
leadership imperatives TI changed its culture from
an authoritarian defense contracting culture to
one in which self directed work teams used their
empowerment to produce dramatic quality and productivity
gains. As a result of the culture change, measurements
of TI management time use show that total management
time spent in making and implementing decisions
dropped by 40 percent from the old to the new style
of leadership. However, by delegating implementation
to empowered work teams, the amount of management
time spent in actual decision making rose fivefold.
The extra time available for decision making improved
the quality of decisions.
- AT&T UCS’s
chairman defined quality in the credit card business
as product and service characteristics that were
"Market Breaker’s and Market Makers."
He and his leadership team were starting up an entirely
new credit card operation in a field with 9,000
well established competitors. To penetrate this
saturated market, they identified the 10 to 15 percent
per year of customers who switched credit cards
as their major opportunity. The leadership team
decided to develop a service and pricing strategy
so attractive to these customers that they would
select and prefer UCS. Long term loyalty to a credit
card is the key to profitability in this business.
The leaders personally committed to base their new
product design on factors which the market would
recognize as benefiting customers more than competitive
offerings. Within 2 years of operation, 42% of consumers
surveyed rated the UCS as the firm that was changing
the market in ways that benefit customers. The nearest
major competitor was cited as the market leader
by only 12 percent of those surveyed. Within 2 years
of start up the firm was the number two credit card
issuer in the market and 3,000 banks had withdrawn
from the market because of five reductions which
AT&T UCS had made in the Annual Percentage Rate
charged on customer balances.
- Solectron’s
CEO formed a vision of Solectron as the best electronics
design and manufacturing service firm in the world.
The CEO and his leadership team have defined basic
values (called Solectron beliefs) for guiding employee
behavior. Solectron’s CEO consistently reinforces
the norm that if behaviors do not reflect the beliefs,
the behaviors must change – not the beliefs. The
values are:
•Customer
First
• Respect for the individual
• Quality
• Develop supplier partnerships
• Shareholder Value
• Social Responsibility
- Boeing Airlift
and Tanker Programs
builds the C-17 aircraft, "the world’s best
moving van," one of the nation’s most potent
tools for shaping international developments. Because
of technological challenges, the program experienced
technical problems, late deliveries and cost over-runs.
By 1991 the Air Force said it would buy only 40
aircraft and no more from Boeing unless there was
drastic improvement. Management realized that they
had to change processes and products to get better
results. Up to that time, schedule had been king
in manufacturing processes. When the schedule said
"move the airplane," Boeing moved it,
ready or not. By 1994, after two and one half years
of poor delivery performance, the Division manager
abruptly changed priorities to 1. Quality, 2. Schedule,
and 3. Cost and forbid manufacturing to move each
airplane in progress until it was ready. This broke
all traditions at Boeing and meant that all parts
had to in the plane, in the right order, before
it moved. This eliminated removal, rework, reinstallation,
and repair that actually required Boeing to rebuild
each new airplane two times before delivery. From
that point on, Boeing never missed another delivery.
- Solectron
trains its senior leaders in the Baldrige framework.
Working on teams, the senior managers of the company
examine and assess all operating units as part of
Solectron’s Total Quality Excellence Award (STQEA).
This award process was benchmarked from AT&T
which has a similar approach to using senior executives
and corporate leaders in assessing business units
against the Baldrige criteria.
- Federal Express
executives assume personal responsibility for improvement
in a defined area of the firm’s performance each
year. This responsibility requires that they spend
a significant amount of time personally learning
about the factors bottlenecking performance in their
area of responsibility. From Chairman, Fred Smith,
on down, executives meet with employees on the job
and learn first hand what factors are helping or
impeding operational productivity. FedEx expects
its leaders to champion changes which will improve
operations as well as maintain a focus on employee
well-being and safety.
- Corning Glass
Works Chairman
Jamie Houghton found that some of his executive
colleagues resisted adoption of the Baldrige framework
as a model for high performance. He challenged these
executives to present an alternative model of a
high performing business organization. The executives
were asked to adopt either an alternative to the
Baldrige framework or the Baldrige model. He mandated
that executives managing without a clear model of
how the firm was to generate outstanding results
were not qualified to lead the firm in the fast
changing optical fiber industry.
- Solectron’s
leadership clearly defines the firm’s mission to
provide world-wide responsiveness to customers by
offering the highest quality, lowest total cost,
customized integrated design, supply chain management,
and manufacturing services through long term partnerships
based on integrity and ethical business practices.
The leadership team communicate the mission and
vision through constant reviews:
• CEO reviews performance
vs. plan monthly
• CEO visits each site
quarterly where managers present to him personally
• General mangers review
customer executive survey annually
• Site managers meet
all employees quarterly to review results, key customer
developments, and status of strategic initiatives.
- Virtually all high
performing firms involve their leaders in reviewing
organization structures and reward and recognition
to ensure that these factors continually reinforce
high performance. Firms such as Solectron establish
a development plan which covers the roles and responsibilities
for high performance in each leadership position.
Reward and recognition approaches reinforce the
desired behaviors consistent with each position.
Firms such as Xerox, GTE Directories, AT&T
Consumer Communications Services among others
place significant stress on leading non-financial
indicators of future success (such as customer and
employee satisfaction) as they do on lagging indicators
such as financial results and market share gains
and losses when reviewing management performance.
- Merrill Lynch
Credit Corporation
uses a "roll down" review system starting
at the top with its 14 mission-level metrics. Each
month, the reviews begin at the top and roll down
through all levels of the organization. At each
level, managers relate their in-process (leading
indicators) and end of process (lagging indicators)
results to the critical few objectives (CFOs) from
the annual plan. They set improvement priorities
based on these objectives. At each level, managers
analyze gaps between actual and plan and investigate
the root causes for being over or under targets.
By coaching lower level managers in developing countermeasures
for slippage on leading indicators of results, leadership
reviews keeps the firm on plan.
- Leadership systems
use promotions to signal leadership behaviors that
the firm encourages. Xerox’s David Kearns
used the firm’s succession planning system to identify
his firm’s leaders in every area and to promote
a sweeping corporate transformation known as the
"Leadership Through Quality" program.
Kearns set a list of 8 behavioral standards for
Xerox leaders, called "role model managers."
These standards covered: promoting Xerox’s overall
Leadership Through Quality strategy; personal use
of and coaching of others to use quality and process
improvement tools and methods; relating all business
decisions to customer satisfaction as a key measure;
encouraging feedback from peers and responding to
feedback by changes in behavior; establishing plans
and meeting them; hiring and promoting people who
uphold the Xerox Leadership Through Quality principles;
rewarding and recognizing those who support the
program and counseling those who need coaching and
guidance. Kearns then surveyed employees on whether
they regarded each Xerox manager as a role model
on the behavioral standards. Those managers not
considered role models by peers and subordinates
(rated as "adequate" or "needs improvement")
in any critical leadership behavior were classified
as not promotable to higher positions until they
modified their behavior to "role model"
in all areas of leadership behavior.
- 3M Dental
Products leadership team defined a
"success culture." This culture was:
- Vision driven
- Customer focused
- Global attitude
- Leadership immersion
- Process saturation
- Employee inclusive
– every employee must be included
- Continuous improvement
– every process every day. At the time of their
Baldrige Award 3M Dental was running the 42nd
revision of their new product development process
under this success culture.
- In the early 90’s
Dale Crownover, owner of Texas Nameplate,
a 66 employee firm, realized that it was not going
anywhere. If TNC lost customers it went out and
replaced them, if it lost employees, someone hired
replacements. The President formed a BELT – the
Business Excellence Leadership Team – to apply the
Baldrige system to the business. These 7 key people
clarified the goals and vision – to be the best
nameplate company in the US by turning delighted
customers into its best marketing tool. Beneath
this came the DOIT – Daily Operation Innovation
Team, supervisors who meet twice a month and run
the business using a system of measurements. Finally,
the rest of the firm’s employees serve on corrective
action, standing, recognition, ISO, and Baldrige
and support service teams. Many of these teams formed
in response to feedback from Texas Quality or Baldrige
Award assessments. By focusing the organization
on excellence, the firm doubled its sales while
holding employment steady.
|
|
|
Martin Stankard
Productivity Development Group, Inc.
POB 488
Westford, MA 01886
info@martinstankard.com
978-692-1818 (TEL)
978-692-5080 (FAX)
| Baldrige | Process |
Consulting | Training |
Tools | About | Contact |
Home | Site |
© 1999, PDG, Inc., all rights reserved
|
|